Another wind in the willows
Life on land
DONATE
YOU CAN SUPPORT CREATIVE COWBOY FILMS BY DONATING
Your support will assist us to continue our research and content development, the greater our resources, the more we can do.
The more we have an accurate understanding of what is happening to nature, the more we can all do to protect what remains of our living planet.
This is also an opportunity for philanthropists to be part of an ongoing project that tells independent stories about the natural world, stories that will help us to better understand what is happening to species and places on our precious planet Earth.
Note: Creative Cowboy Films does NOT have tax deductible charity status.
Become a Member
Becoming a member of Creative cowboy films The Nature Knowledge Channel is a very real way you can help the precious natural world and support the work we do in creating knowledge about what is happening to it.
Membership
You can access thiscontent and other stories by becoming a member or donating
Sign up NowBecoming a member of Creative cowboy films
The Nature Knowledge Channel is a very real way you can help the precious natural world and support the work we do in creating knowledge about the natural world.
Annual membership of the Creative cowboy films - Nature Knowledge Channel gives you full access to content, stories and films, available on this website. Becoming a member of the Creative cowboy films - Nature Knowledge Channel is a very real way you can help the natural world and support our work in creating a greater understanding about what is happening to it.
A point of difference
Creative cowboy films is independent, is not funded by governments or industry, and is not influenced by their associated interest groups. For reasons of independent research and content development, Creative cowboy films does NOT have tax deductible charity status.
“A great outcome for Badgers and transparency. But in a well organised world, it shouldn’t have taken two tiny organisations so much work to get NE and Defra to this inevitable point”. Rosie Wood, Chair of Badger Trust
The outcome of this case is a formal acknowledgement from both Natural England and the Secretary of State for Defra that future decisions to authorise Badger culling must be grounded solely in relevant scientific and legal considerations. Factors relating to the need to appease farmers, protect budget interests, or respond to political pressure are now recognised as illegitimate and unlawful influences. The case has not only improved transparency within public bodies but has also sent a strong message regarding the independence required in statutory decision-making related to wildlife protection.
Landing images: Damian Kuzdak
The outcome of this landmark legal challenge represents strengthened protection for Badgers in the UK, ensuring culling decisions cannot be improperly influenced by farming, political, or financial pressures. Future culling authorisations must now focus strictly on objective, scientific criteria, marking a significant advance in environmental governance and access to justice.
Badger culling has long been a controversial aspect of UK policy aimed at controlling bovine tuberculosis (bTB) in cattle. The practice has faced sustained opposition from wildlife and environmental organisations on scientific, ethical, and legal grounds.
A major legal challenge to supplementary Badger cull licences was brought by Wild Justice and the Badger Trust, culminating in significant policy concessions from Natural England (NE) and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). This challenge, initiated in August 2024 and concluding in June 2026, scrutinised the decision-making process behind additional culling licences issued in May 2024.
“A great outcome for Badgers and transparency. But in a well organised world, it shouldn’t have taken two tiny organisations so much work to get NE and Defra to this inevitable point. The public purse could have been saved many tens of thousands of pounds had Natural England and Defra not incurred additional costs. They could easily have conceded the central points at issue when raised in correspondence two years ago, rather than, in one instance, on the afternoon of our hearing. Independent statutory bodies should be able to act independently, and they should think very carefully about how they make future decisions: the natural environment, their staff, stakeholders, and the taxpayer all deserve much better”. Rosie Wood, Chair of Badger Trust
Key Findings and Outcomes
- Internal Natural England documents, revealed during the legal process, showed that factors such as relationships with the farming community, pressures from the National Farmers Union (NFU), fear of compensation claims, and budgetary considerations were referenced as relevant to the culling decision.
- The NE Director of Science had advised at the time that there was “no justification” for the cull, yet 26 supplementary cull licences were still issued.
Concessions and Precedent
- During legal proceedings, NE and Defra formally conceded that farming interests, budget pressures, and political considerations are improper and unlawful factors in determining Badger cull licences.
- Both bodies have now recognised that future culling decisions must be made based solely on lawful, scientific, and objective considerations.
Access to Environmental Justice
The case also marked a landmark in ensuring access to environmental justice. Natural England’s attempt to remove standard costs protections (as established under the Aarhus Convention) for claimants was rejected by the court.
The court reaffirmed that environmental legal challenges serve public interest and must remain accessible to non-profit organisations. Natural England indicated it would not pursue such challenges to costs protections in future cases.
Legal representatives and leaders of both Wild Justice and Badger Trust highlighted the significance of the case in exposing improper decision-making processes and reinforcing the requirement for scientific rigour and transparency in public environmental decisions. The case has been described as a victory both for wildlife and for transparency and accountability in statutory decision-making.
Implications and Future Steps:
Natural England and Defra have committed to lessons learned and a more robust, independent, and evidence-based approach to future Badger culling decisions.
The case affirms that independent oversight remains both necessary and effective in influencing public policy related to wildlife protection.
Enhancing transparency and upholding legal and scientific integrity is now recognised as central to the legitimacy and effectiveness of Badger protection and broader environmental governance in the UK.
No items found.
Related
Badgers, Brexit and the Great Crested Newt
What, one might ask, has happened to Britain? Brexit, Newt wars, Badger culls, a Hedgehog crisis, vanishing birdlife populations, decline in flowering plants, loss of biodiversity continues and to top it all off, polluted waterways.
Ways of seeing
In the ten years to 2008 well over 1,000 new species were discovered in Papua New Guinea, again like so many species in the region, many of these newly discovered species are at grave risk from exploitation of the natural environment.